Re: SCO plans on going after *BSD next year
From: jpd (read_the_sig_at_do.not.spam.it)
Date: 11/24/03
- Next message: james
hal-pc.org: "Re: support D-Link DSL-200 ?" - Previous message: james
hal-pc.org: "Re: Novice having trouble building kernel - UPG from 4.7 --> 4.9" - In reply to: John S. Dyson: "Re: SCO plans on going after *BSD next year"
- Next in thread: Michel Talon: "Re: SCO plans on going after *BSD next year"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:37:33 +0000 (UTC)
In article <bpmr2d$29ej$2@news.iquest.net>, John S. Dyson wrote:
[snip]
> For example, another wonderful (but under developed) project: TenDRA,
> doesn't get alot of attention from me (even though it is interesting.)
> It is missing some of the really important dot-items that make it
> as valuable as FreeBSD.
Do you have an estimate on how much work it'd be to get it into a useful
state (for FreeBSD)?
I've been meaning to look at it but --still struggling to along with C++
-- I didn't proceed with it when it missed the STL bits that I'd used in
my toy programs. This was, well, a year or so ago.
-- j p d (at) d s b (dot) t u d e l f t (dot) n l .
- Next message: james
hal-pc.org: "Re: support D-Link DSL-200 ?" - Previous message: james
hal-pc.org: "Re: Novice having trouble building kernel - UPG from 4.7 --> 4.9" - In reply to: John S. Dyson: "Re: SCO plans on going after *BSD next year"
- Next in thread: Michel Talon: "Re: SCO plans on going after *BSD next year"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|