Re: Some more questions on FreeBsd usage

From: Lowell Gilbert (lgusenet_at_be-well.ilk.org)
Date: 11/26/03


Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 21:50:57 GMT

hannibal@videocam.net.au (hannibal) writes:

> I have installed Mplayer from the ports. Do you know how can I start
> it with a gui (I installed it with Gui support)? I don't like using
> mplayer with it's CLI interface.

According to /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer/Makefile,
the GUI is called "gmplayer".

> Also I want to add OpenOffice and Gimp to my BSD from the packages
> (I'm on dialup and using the ports is very slow and costly for me). Is
> OpenOffice and Gimp on the FreeBsd 4.9 release disks (the 2 iso's)?

I don't think either is on the first disk. The second disk doesn't
have any packages; I seem to recall that it's a fixit disk or at least
a live filesystem of some flavor.

> Will it work if I put the first cd and do: pkg_add -r openoffice?

No, '-r' is the 'remote' fetching feature. If the package is on the
disk, then you can mount the disk and run pkg_add directly on the
package. If the package isn't on there, nothing you can do will get
it to build from there.

> Also, from an unknown reason my cd-writer doesn't want to burn cd's
> under WinXp anymore (I'm using Nero for this job). Is there a program
> for BSD equivalent to Nero Burning Rom? What do you reccomend me?

If your writer is ATAPI, then burncd(8) in the base system will do the
job. If the drive is SCSI, then install cdrecord from the ports. If
your Windows program is mysteriously failing, though, you may have
hardware problems.

> My conclusion so far on FreeBsd is that it's an amazing OS, capable of
> many things but it's not intended for someone who has a dial-up
> connection. It's simply a pain to install all those ports. Someone
> should put an iso image online with all the ports so we don't have to
> install them from the net everytime.

A lot of people run it just fine from dial-up connections. But if a
program is hundreds of megabytes, it's going to require you to
download that much. Downloading an ISO file (which would be tens of
gigabytes large, so you wouldn't be able to burn it to any currently
existing medium anyway) just means you get to download it in one lump
with lots of other packages as well.

Whether you download the source (for the port) or the pre-compiled
package doesn't matter a whole lot, in many cases. They are usually
in the same neighborhood in terms of size (say, within a factor of
two). But if you're downloading these things, then you have to
download them -- FreeBSD has already done everything it can to shrink
them down.

The one thing you can work on is making sure that you make the most of
the time you spend online. When building a port, "make fetch-recursive"
will grab all the distfiles it needs before starting to actually
compile anything. This means you get full usage of your network link,
and can disconnect when the build begins.

If all of these hints still leave you with more downloading than you
want to do, you'll need a different way to get the data. Buying
CDROMs or having a friend with more bandwidth make one for you are
some obvious options.

Be well.



Relevant Pages

  • APT -- if I do this will I screw the pooch?
    ... I typically use aptitude in command-line mode as a front-end to APT. ... I was thinking of setting up the notebook by doing a basic install off my old woody CDs I originally set up my desktop off of, getting a working net connection in place, then immediately upgrading everything via the net to current stable before building out the system any further. ... I don't want the notebook to have to download them all again, especially since security.debian.org, which has a lot of the latest versions of stable packages, seems to get overloaded and be very slow to download at times. ... This is because although I want them both to use the same repository of downloaded package files, I want the two machines to independently track what's installed, so I don't have to keep installed packages identical on both machines. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: FC5 - T3 - Had enough. Package Managers, Yumex is crap.
    ... I finished update with a broken X server, blew my system away using apt-get and answering yes to the extreme package removal in order to add one package and a host of other mishaps. ... FC5 test cycle was the easiest to install and deal with me in relation to other Development cycles. ... Usually there are still packages cached in /var/cache/yum/development/packages after pirut exits. ... earlier which started the download in the first place. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Need to build some systems this week. Snapshots?
    ... wants KDE on it. ... First was that KDE was installed as a binary package... ... Second, the install failed. ... The reason appears to be a conflict between ports and packages. ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: package managment
    ... > I'm just getting to know my way round BSD now Ive got my box running and ... and then just ask the package management tool to ... You have ports an packages. ... files that tell FreeBSD what needs done to install a particular software (such ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: WMP 11 Anyone get this?
    ... Download complete. ... Package install complete. ... Package 'User Mode Driver Framework'. ... Package 'Windows Media Format Runtime'. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsmedia.player)