Re: Question about portsdb

From: Kris Kennaway (kkenn_at_rot13.obsecurity.org)
Date: 11/30/03


Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 06:00:01 GMT

On 2003-11-30, John Eggert <finarfinjge@hotmail.com> wrote:

> You were indeed clear. If you use a 'REFUSE' file, your index will not
> be buildable. I'm confused by: what then is the function (indeed, the
> use) of a refuse file?

cvsup is a generic tool, it has uses in other situations other than
the ports collection. Also, not everyone needs to build INDEX, in
which case you may not care that you have ports that depend on
nonexistent ports you have refused, because you may never install
them.

Kris



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Probelms and Inconsistencies with Portupgrade
    ... >>My problems surfaced when I updated Portupgrade with reference to ... The cvsup refuse file would be manually generated *ignored ports ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Probelms and Inconsistencies with Portupgrade
    ... >> getting rid of your refuse file, cvsup the ports tree again then ... Kent Stewart ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Question on cvsup of ports and refuse file
    ... I've been able to get cvsup working the way I want as far as ports are ... a question on cvsup and refuse file ran through my mind today ... lets say I setup a brand new server and dont use any refuse ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Problem when making index in /usr/ports
    ... system is telling it not to download certain ports, ... You most probably have a refuse file in place. ... run 'make fetchindex' after you update with cvsup. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Question about portsdb
    ... Kris Kennaway wrote: ... > cvsup is a generic tool, it has uses in other situations other than ... > the ports collection. ... refuse file and a possible cost. ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)