Re: kernels

From: Billy O'Connor (billyoc_at_gnuyork.org)
Date: 01/22/04


Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:46:44 GMT

msg1825@yahoo.com (MSG) writes:

> Hello
>
> With regard to free OSes like Linux and FreeBSD, what do statements
> like "FreeBSD is designed, while Linux just grows" and "FreeBSD
> _scales_ better" mean? "Scales" with respect to what: the number of
> CPUs? the number of users? disks? CPU load?
> And if it's true, why do hardware manufacturers like SGI, IBM and Dell
> seem to prefer Linux?

In this context, it usually means number of CPU's.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: kernels
    ... > With regard to free OSes like Linux and FreeBSD, ... CPU load? ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: SMP on FreeBSD 6.x and 7.0: Worth doing?
    ... As has been reported in some other messages on this list, Linux is ... This is with 4 GB RAM, the GENERIC FreeBSD ... How much CPU load is there on the server during this benchmark? ... phaenomenon then it has nothing to do with file I/O. ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question
    ... the FreeBSD developers told everyone that 5.3 was da ... initially over linux not because there's a bunch of good guys on the ... My tests measure kernel performance; ... > a networking device is a key performance indicator. ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Newbie Experience
    ... I've only been around since FreeBSD 5.4 ... FreeBSD kernel too. ... always sunshine and linux is farts. ... in the hey day of AT&T Unix I'm ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Review of FreeBSD 5.4
    ... but not less problems compared to FreeBSD. ... If you like to have a bleeding edge system using debian --- just go ... > the linux kernel suffers. ... When the kernel suffers, everyone who uses ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)