Re: Just starting FreeBSD 5.2.1 or should I downgrade to 4.9?
From: PiotrAF (piotraf_at_nospam.poczta.onet.pl)
Date: 02/27/04
- Next message: J.Lymbzero: "Re: natd CPU strain"
- Previous message: Steve O'Hara-Smith: "Re: need a pointer: making the switch from ghostscript-gnu to ghostscript-afpl"
- In reply to: Rob MacGregor: "Re: Just starting FreeBSD 5.2.1 or should I downgrade to 4.9?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:16:37 +0100
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:58:07 +0000, Rob MacGregor wrote:
> I would say that 4.9 would be a better choice if you're new to unix (and
> in particular FreeBSD). However now you've got it installed you might
> as well leave it running unless you personally have a good reason to
> install 4.9. Keep in mind that it's a re-install, not a downgrade.
>
Well, in fact, I meant install of fresh one due to incompatility (I
think?) of the new file system.
> My home mail server has been running the 5.x series since late 5.1, and
> it's had no problem. That however is partly because I follow (as you're
> advised to do) the freebsd-current mailing list.
Yes, that was the answer I wanted :) Well, I've been in Gentoo for almost
a year so probably I will manage and join the mailing list a.s.a.p.
Thanks :)
- Next message: J.Lymbzero: "Re: natd CPU strain"
- Previous message: Steve O'Hara-Smith: "Re: need a pointer: making the switch from ghostscript-gnu to ghostscript-afpl"
- In reply to: Rob MacGregor: "Re: Just starting FreeBSD 5.2.1 or should I downgrade to 4.9?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
