Re: preserving older versions of libraries?

From: Kris Kennaway (kkenn_at_xor.obsecurity.org)
Date: 04/22/04


Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:21:35 -0000

On 2004-04-21, Ben Crowell <bcrowell04@nospam.lightXXXXXandmatter.com> wrote:

> Am I being stupid? Is there a better way to do this? A lot of people seem
> to recommend using portupgrade to deal with shared library hassles, but my
> experience with portupgrade has been negative; I never know exactly what
> it's going to decide to do, or which options to give it, and the result
> sometimes seems to be the same kind of breakage.

As with any tool, if you don't learn how to use it properly you'll end
up causing yourself problems. portupgrade isn't that hard, really, or
dangerous when properly used. See e.g. the -n option to solve your
concern about unpredictability.

Kris



Relevant Pages

  • Re: preserving older versions of libraries?
    ... > to recommend using portupgrade to deal with shared library hassles, ... Use portupgrade and the old shared libraries are automatically preserved ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
  • Re: Gnu and Gnome library hell...?
    ... Ben Crowell wrote: ... Then I did a portupgrade -vfR, but I still get the same error. ... Usually if it finds broken dependencies I let it ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)