Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?
From: Mike Scott (usenet.9_at_antispam.protection.scottsonline.org.uk)
Date: 05/05/04
- Next message: Stefan Walter: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- Previous message: Tim Daneliuk: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- In reply to: Markus Kolb: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- Next in thread: Stefan Walter: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- Reply: Stefan Walter: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- Reply: Brent Bolin: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 09:59:29 +0100
On Wed, 05 May 2004 00:26:52 +0200, Markus Kolb
<usenet-052004@tower-net.de> wrote:
>Paul Southworth wrote:
>
>> In article <c7925c$17lhl$1@ID-12889.news.uni-berlin.de>,
>> Markus Kolb <usenet-052004@tower-net.de> wrote:
>>
>>>Hello,
>>>
>>>I am wondering about practical negative aspects of installing FreeBSD
>>>5.2.1 instead of 4.9 or 4.10, if released, ...
>>>Can you tell me some important facts why I should use 4.x for an
>>>Internet server?
...
>Ok.
>I've just found some text on freebsd.org that tells that it can be ports
>can not compile in 5.2.1.
>That is a powerful fact to use 4.x.
Unfortunately, there's at least one port (spamd) that is set to
"ignore" on 4.x. For no particularly good reason I can see, as with
minor breakages fixed it compiles perfectly well on 4.9. I don't know
how many other ports are "5.x only" :-(
-- Please use the corrected version of the address below for replies. Replies to the header address will be junked, as will mail from various domains listed at www.scottsonline.org.uk regards. Mike Scott Harlow Essex England.(unet -a-t- scottsonline.org.uk)
- Next message: Stefan Walter: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- Previous message: Tim Daneliuk: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- In reply to: Markus Kolb: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- Next in thread: Stefan Walter: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- Reply: Stefan Walter: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- Reply: Kris Kennaway: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- Reply: Brent Bolin: "Re: Why I should use FBSD 4.9/10 and not 5.2.1?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|