Re: BIND

From: jpd (read_the_sig_at_do.not.spam.it)
Date: 05/16/04

  • Next message: Henri Hennebert: "Re: Conceptual ipfw question under FreeBSD 5.2.1"
    Date: Sun, 16 May 2004 08:33:45 +0000 (UTC)
    
    

    On 2004-05-16, wally <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
    > jpd wrote:
    >
    >> On 2004-05-15, wally <root@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
    > I am using no-ip.com, I have no clue how they map me on their DNS, as i said
    > its a free welfare service.
    [snip]
    >> One word: ``delegation''. Pointing a domain name somewhere is different
    >> from the yyy.com people delegating the subdomain to some other (==your)
    >> DNS server so you can give hosts names in that subdomain.
    >
    > Well that might me my problem, I just figured that they will forward all the
    > traffic for xxx.no-ip.com to my ip, so any host lookups for the MX
    > mail.xxx.no-ip.com will come in at my NAT gateway at port 53 where i
    > forward it to the server running BIND to resolve them back to just

    Wishful thinking. Nobody does that by default.

    > xxx.no-ip.com so that the host trying to send incoming mail will then come
    > at port 25 on my NAT and the gateway will forward that to the server
    > running sendmail.

    Looking at their site, it _seems_ that with no-ip free you can not just
    have an A record but even up to three MX records. So you'll want to add
    a MX record to point to your IP, then your portforwarder there can pick
    up incoming mail and deliver it to your NATed mailbox.

    You might want to get a friend to do backup-MX for you though. Something
    like someone else with a no-ip free account who also wants mail on his
    own machine on a ``I scratch your back, you scratch mine'' basis.

    -- 
      j p d (at) d s b (dot) t u d e l f t (dot) n l .
    

  • Next message: Henri Hennebert: "Re: Conceptual ipfw question under FreeBSD 5.2.1"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Big problems with SBS 2003 Email & Internet Connection Wizard
      ... start from scratch again. ... "Andreas Warberg" wrote: ... >> The server is running a single nic with a router on a DSL connection. ... >> has the correct records in DNS for both my domain name and MX. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: dns lookup failure
      ... > This occured during an upgrade to W2k Server. ... > Had to rebuild from scratch, ... I suspect possible disjointed namespace or you ISP's DNS in TCP/IP ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.dns)
    • Issues migrating SBS 2003 domain to Server 2008 Standard
      ... We are stuck migrating our SBS 2003 domain to Server 2008. ... Fatal Error:DsGetDcName (SRV-EXCH) call failed, ... Verify your Domain Name Sysytem (DNS) is ... network connectivity to a domain controller. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: AD management snap in cannot find DC (netdiag /v workstation)
      ... The name.local entries are used by my apache server to implement ... change button, more button, the "Primary DNS suffix of this ... Attr: subschemaSubentry ... Owner of the binding path: ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
    • Re: AD management snap in cannot find DC (netdiag /v workstation)
      ... button, more button, the "Primary DNS suffix of this computer", it should ... The Security System could not establish a secured connection with the server ... Attr: subschemaSubentry ... Owner of the binding path: ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)