Re: -lpthreads and FreeBSD 5

From: Will (will5404_at_INVALIDyahoo.com)
Date: 07/10/04 

Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 02:08:40 -0500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Just for reference of anyone running into similar problems as me, yes I
did do the full upgrade the problem was with the port its self that was
fixed after I cvsuped my port tree, so I simply updated again and it was
fixed.

09 Jul 2004 02:48:56 Original commit Commit details files touched by
this commit 1.7 marcus Remove some bugs threading stuff that sneaked
into the last patch.

Remove some bugs threading stuff that sneaked into the last patch.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
| On 2004-07-10, Will <will5404@INVALIDyahoo.com> wrote:
|
|>I've been trying to compile /usr/ports/www/mozilla with little luck, I
|>wouldnt even bother compiling it but gnome requires I have it. It fails
|>with /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpthread from what I read under FreeBSD 5
|>it should be using -lc_r instead of pthreads, configure seemed to pickup
|>that I do not have lpthreads but do have lc_r but during compile it
|>still wants to use that :( for sake of testing purposes I did goto the
|>dir where it failed, and tried replacing manually in the line -lpthreads
|>with -lc_r and it compiled, but of course there's numerous cases where
|>it complains about it being missing. Any idea which makefiles I would
|>have to edit for it to use -lc_r instead of -lpthreads?
|
|
| No, it should not be using -lc_r, and -lpthread is installed standard
| on FreeBSD 5.x.
|
|
|>Im currently running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 just grabbed the kernel
|>source a couple days ago, and CVSUPed the ports tree a couple days ago
|>aswell.
|
|
| Did you only update the kernel, or did you do a complete upgrade as
| described in detail in the handbook? If the former, that's your
| problem.
|
| Kris

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEVAwUBQO+V9x3sNDgzOj+bAQJntQf+N/KduObQMa2zHE4OyjtZ9N4HtACf+LZW
2xMirXiFm9XhHruDmeEMIc0jpjTg7qfXm0+FaSpr0bGinsreGu7HrTEF7iWF4AjA
Qpc7UiqOsdQraH5saOQbGAZk5inczmoRnmuXdvi7ppKGEtQTGuDPNOY+oWlR7nSS
YBHmAwi0LPO1YDsDvberhaNrWC4F1SjPXG+Vh1AHEGJQpjnAvBbCZDk/HqtWUbGu
G4+SccrN/puxuhm0TWpV029p6Zaeos/C7j1sbiS94hWVIoPFT0hYMzNOLryH16Ei
oeA/sPQ8+mFAXEQlEOvKvtX/wFKb3Cl8VuCU5D+My8f7oUzX/UnLWQ==
=1nkb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Relevant Pages

  • Problem compiling gcc3.4
    ... On my FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE GENERIC (yeah, I will upgrade soon) I can't ... get the gcc3.4 port to compile. ... is it just that the port is broken for 5.2? ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: Problem compiling gcc3.4
    ... On Mon, 3 Jan 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: ... >> get the gcc3.4 port to compile. ... Time to learn mergemaster and do that upgrade then... ...
    (freebsd-questions)
  • Re: FreeBSD 7.1 and BIND exploit
    ... | Will FreeBSD 7.1 be released in time to use it as an upgrade to ... BIND, update BIND now. ... Make sure that you are not specifying a port via any ...
    (freebsd-stable)
  • Re: firefox 2 on FreeBSD 6.1
    ... and don't have time to upgrade to FreeBSD 6.2. ... upgrade a port. ... Can't see this in the Handbook. ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
  • Re: I have some questions about telnet/telnetd/libtelnet/tn3270 and why FreeBSD is different than ot
    ... What I mean by this is: that i think having it as a port is a good thing ... > order to allow 'world' to compile without problems. ... >> Why should this ports be in the base system? ... FreeBSD is not OpenBSD or NetBSD ...
    (freebsd-questions)