Re: Route question
From: +Alan Hicks+ (alan_at_lizella.netWORK)
Date: 08/31/04
- Next message: Simon Barner: "Re: Email Address Change"
- Previous message: talon_at_lpthe.jussieu.fr: "Re: kernel security and netgraph nodes"
- In reply to: Jean-Yves Avenard: "Route question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 31 Aug 2004 10:21:34 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc, Jean-Yves Avenard dared to utter,
> I see where the problem lies. Incoming packets go to 192.168.0.10, get
> nated and forwarded to 192.168.0.3 , who answers through its default
> route and go to 192.168.0.1 get natd and exit outside; which are then
> probably discarded by my DSL provider's router as orroute original has
> changed.
Not exactly. They are discarded by the remote machine you are
connecting to as their source IP address doesn't match any active
connections for that machine.
> Any ideas how I could achieve the above?
Yeah. ssh to .10, and then from there ssh to .3. It's simple and you're
done. For backup that should be sufficient.
- --
It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise,
Than for a man to hear the song of fools.
Ecclesiastes 7:5
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBNJc8lKR45I6cfKARAt3CAJ0eoviTcHe8R9U6mX+smsFqonP3YgCeO7du
hlfLzrieuMr5wpzVjyQZOUQ=
=Pjgt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: Simon Barner: "Re: Email Address Change"
- Previous message: talon_at_lpthe.jussieu.fr: "Re: kernel security and netgraph nodes"
- In reply to: Jean-Yves Avenard: "Route question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
