Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure.
From: Cancerous Jaw (cj_at_mayo.clinic.hold.the.pickles)
Date: 09/11/04
- Next message: Thomas Wolf: "Re: upgrades have left phpbb2 dead in the water"
- Previous message: Dave Uhring: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- In reply to: Freeride: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- Next in thread: Martin: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 04:53:59 GMT
Freeride wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:18:44 -0700, Mike Cox wrote:
>> I've tried it. Heck, once i've forgotten my Windows
>> 2000 Admin password and was locked out forever.
security is bound to ownership
if you own data, you should always be able to get to it.
if not, you should never be able to get to it.
for example, take a business with 3 partners.
each may have admin rights.
so 1 of the 3 could lock out the other 3 with a simple password change.
that is not legal, and not secure
- Next message: Thomas Wolf: "Re: upgrades have left phpbb2 dead in the water"
- Previous message: Dave Uhring: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- In reply to: Freeride: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- Next in thread: Martin: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|