Re: remote backups: SCP or RSYNC or -?
From: Richard Caley (_at_)
Date: 10/27/04
- Next message: Keve Nagy: "DSL solution recommendations (long)"
- Previous message: Gregory Toomey: "Re: remote backups: SCP or RSYNC or -?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Martin: "remote backups: SCP or RSYNC or -?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:01:03 GMT
In article <10ntno65fv2cobc@news.supernews.com>, nospam (n) writes:
n> I do like the sound of nRSYNC's ability to maintain mirrors, but
n> don't want to install something that would require additional open
n> server ports on my LANs,
rsync will operate over ssh rather than using it's own demon
mode. When you do that it is basicly the more intelligent scp you ask
for.
I use it to run long remote copies overnight I can kick it off in the
evening, kill it in the morning, set it off to carry on the next
evening and so on.
--
Mail me as MYFIRSTNAME@MYLASTNAME.org.uk _O_
|<
- Next message: Keve Nagy: "DSL solution recommendations (long)"
- Previous message: Gregory Toomey: "Re: remote backups: SCP or RSYNC or -?"
- In reply to:(deleted message) Martin: "remote backups: SCP or RSYNC or -?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
