dns resolution issues in recent days????
From: John Smith (jsmith_at_macroshaft.com)
Date: 12/16/04
- Next message: David: "Re: Hylafax 4.2.0 + FreeBSD : I'm giving up."
- Previous message: Justin Murdock: "Re: Installing FreeBSD 5.3"
- Next in thread: Mark South: "Re: dns resolution issues in recent days????"
- Reply: Mark South: "Re: dns resolution issues in recent days????"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:41:25 -0500
i've copied this from my post to an openbsd newsgroup...
has anyone else had any dns issues recently?
-------------------
Subject: Re: DNS Isuue
From: John Smith <jsmith@macroshaft.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:35:35 -0500
this sounds similar to some things i've been seeing as well. I recently
installed openbsd 3.6 w/ pf as a home based firewall... (on a comcast
cable modem)...it seems to take FOREVER to resolve lookups.. i have not
really investigated it fully since it is only a firewall.. I also
recently installed Freebsd on my primary pc, it too acts very strangely w/
dns queries...
on both my openbsd and freebsd computers, when i install from ports, it
seems to hang a long time before the downloads begin. w/ openbsd, lynx
seems to hang forever as well.
w/ my freebsd computer, at home opera web browser is the only one that
responds right away (as opposed to mozilla, or firefox)..at work - all web
browsers work equally fast. nslookups on either one seem fast though.
also, at home, my windows (2003) server still is just fine w/ IE .
i think the 512byte size thing sounds promising...
have you heard anything else about this?
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:04:06 +0000, Keith Matthews wrote:
> I'm having trouble with the DNS setup on a new installation.
>
> It answers queries for the root name servers correctly, likewise zones for
> which it is the master, but other zones typically get a 'no servers could
> be reached'.
>
> This is on 3.6 (but a repackaged version following application of patches 1
> to 6). PF is in use but has the same rules as orginal issue 3.6 hosts that
> work normally. named.conf in the duff setup is indentical to that for one
> of the ones that work (apart from the zone file names, checked with diff).
>
> suggestions on comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains included
>
> " Your firewall is blocking EDNS responsed that exceed 512 bytes.
> You don't have IPv6 connectivity.
>
> AAAA records were recently added for A.GTLD-SERVERS.NET and
> B.GTLD-SERVERS.NET. This caused EDNS referrals to the COM/NET
> servers to exceed 512 bytes. It highlighted a bug in named.
>
> Named recovers from both of these but not before applications
> time out.
>
> If the firewall is blocking the EDNS responses you won't get
> a answer to the first query but you will to the second."
>
> niether of which seem very likely on 3.6.
>
> Anyone got any clues ?
- Next message: David: "Re: Hylafax 4.2.0 + FreeBSD : I'm giving up."
- Previous message: Justin Murdock: "Re: Installing FreeBSD 5.3"
- Next in thread: Mark South: "Re: dns resolution issues in recent days????"
- Reply: Mark South: "Re: dns resolution issues in recent days????"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|