Re: AMD64 floating point performance 32 vs. 64
From: Nino Dehne (usenet-2005-01-b07e88f7_at_0x54434D.net)
Date: 01/07/05
- Next message: jbacon_at_mcw.edu: "Re: AMD64 floating point performance 32 vs. 64"
- Previous message: Logan Shaw: "Re: AMD64 floating point performance 32 vs. 64"
- In reply to: jbacon_at_mcw.edu: "AMD64 floating point performance 32 vs. 64"
- Next in thread: jbacon_at_mcw.edu: "Re: AMD64 floating point performance 32 vs. 64"
- Reply: jbacon_at_mcw.edu: "Re: AMD64 floating point performance 32 vs. 64"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:31:37 +0100
jbacon@mcw.edu wrote:
> CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+ (2210.77-MHz K8-class CPU)
^^^^^^^
> Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0xf4a Stepping = 10
^^^^^ ^^
> CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+ (2411.75-MHz 686-class CPU)
^^^^^^^
> Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0xfc0 Stepping = 0
^^^^^ ^
How about using identical CPUs and _then_ perform benchmarks that
compare 32bit vs. 64bit?
Just a thought,
ND
- Next message: jbacon_at_mcw.edu: "Re: AMD64 floating point performance 32 vs. 64"
- Previous message: Logan Shaw: "Re: AMD64 floating point performance 32 vs. 64"
- In reply to: jbacon_at_mcw.edu: "AMD64 floating point performance 32 vs. 64"
- Next in thread: jbacon_at_mcw.edu: "Re: AMD64 floating point performance 32 vs. 64"
- Reply: jbacon_at_mcw.edu: "Re: AMD64 floating point performance 32 vs. 64"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]