Re: Can PF CARP go thru router?
From: Greg Hennessy (me_at_privacy.org)
Date: 03/06/05
- Next message: Jona Joachim: "Re: ifconfig at startup"
- Previous message: Jed Clear: "Re: Failover dhcpd server doesn't response"
- In reply to: Per Hedeland: "Re: Can PF CARP go thru router?"
- Next in thread: Per Hedeland: "Re: Can PF CARP go thru router?"
- Reply: Per Hedeland: "Re: Can PF CARP go thru router?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:00:18 +0000
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 23:58:32 +0000 (UTC), per@hedeland.org (Per Hedeland)
wrote:
>>All the CARP data is placed inside an Ethernet frame with a protocol
>>number of 112 (by default). Layer two switches should be able to pass
>>the frames, but layer three routers probably will not.
>>
>>
>>The designers of CARP hope to eventually get over this limitation,
>>but it has not occurred yet.
>
>Hm, what's the point of doing that?
How about load balancing services which are not on a locally attached
network.
greg
-- Delenda est Carthago
- Next message: Jona Joachim: "Re: ifconfig at startup"
- Previous message: Jed Clear: "Re: Failover dhcpd server doesn't response"
- In reply to: Per Hedeland: "Re: Can PF CARP go thru router?"
- Next in thread: Per Hedeland: "Re: Can PF CARP go thru router?"
- Reply: Per Hedeland: "Re: Can PF CARP go thru router?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|