Re: rsync or fetchmail?
From: c0ldbyte (c0ldbyte_at_comp.unix.admin)
Date: 03/31/05
- Next message: Richard Caley: "Re: rsync or fetchmail?"
- Previous message: sam: "rsync or fetchmail?"
- In reply to: sam: "rsync or fetchmail?"
- Next in thread: Richard Caley: "Re: rsync or fetchmail?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:54:59 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-03-31, sam <sam.wun@authtec.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that rsync can be used to copy a remote email server's
> directories/folders to a local email server. But I know many people use
> fetchmail. Fetchmail can be configured to run in a time interval, rsync
> is more close to real-time update.
>
> Which is better? rsync or fetchmail?
>
> Thanks
> Sam
Think you better read the two man pages for those both again.
fetchmail is definately a mail fetcher you got that part right
but rsync ? come on reread the rsync man page again to after
the first initial time. If you want you can even do a comparison
on the two man pages and im sure youll come up with what Im
thinking at this very moment.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
Comment: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF7DF979F
Comment: Fingerprint = D1DC 0AA4 1C4E EAD4 24EB 7E77 B261 50BA F7DF 979F
iD8DBQFCS9cCsmFQuvffl58RAkN7AJkBBOLvjD+Gk6UuhGZFQ9SWaF91lQCfQMRc
ilvi9juSLQnVGNADNhGW0BY=
=Cs8J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- ( When in doubt, use brute force. -- Ken Thompson 1998 )
- Next message: Richard Caley: "Re: rsync or fetchmail?"
- Previous message: sam: "rsync or fetchmail?"
- In reply to: sam: "rsync or fetchmail?"
- Next in thread: Richard Caley: "Re: rsync or fetchmail?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
