Re: So, what is the state of Linux vs FreeBSD?

On Tue, 04 Apr 2006 08:47:41 +0000, Michel Talon wrote:

Elvis <elvis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Ext3 is about 4 times faster than ufs

You are joking.

Seen it for myself.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: So, what is the state of Linux vs FreeBSD?
  - From: Michel Talon

References:
- So, what is the state of Linux vs FreeBSD?
  - From: Wil
- Re: So, what is the state of Linux vs FreeBSD?
  - From: Elvis
- Re: So, what is the state of Linux vs FreeBSD?
  - From: Michel Talon

Relevant Pages

Re: So, what is the state of Linux vs FreeBSD?
... Ext3 is about 4 times faster than ufs ... Because you have not remarked that Linux returns while the IO is occurring, ... UFS is as least as fast ...
(comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
Re: So, what is the state of Linux vs FreeBSD?
... Ext3 is about 4 times faster than ufs ... You are joking. ... Michel TALON ...
(comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
Re: So, what is the state of Linux vs FreeBSD?
... Ext3 is about 4 times faster than ufs ... Because you have not remarked that Linux returns while the IO is occurring, ... UFS is as least as fast ... I've only just started to use freebsd about ...
(comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
... On Wednesday 12 March 2008 23:30, David Newall wrote: ... What I want to know is this: Is it really 25 times faster than ... ext3 with an equally huge buffer cache? ... Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ...
(Linux-Kernel)
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
... Daniel Phillips wrote: ... What I want to know is this: Is it really 25 times faster than ... ext3 with an equally huge buffer cache? ...
(Linux-Kernel)