Re: major DNS hiccup

In article <E5Rsg.96337$uP.82275@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Mike Scott
<usenet.10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

If it's ntl (I'm Cambridge too, btw - Harlow) I can't imagine what
they're doing. I see reply packets with correct checksums and no
noticeable missing packets - so they'd have to be intercepting DNS
packets, garbaging and retransmitting them: somehow I doubt ntl could
manage that quite so successfully :-)

You still haven't posted any traces from failed lookups - if you do,
maybe someone could figure out just what is wrong with them...

--Per Hedeland
per@xxxxxxxxxxxx
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: major DNS hiccup
    ... my failures began at 11:03:54 on Jul 6. ... noticeable missing packets - so they'd have to be intercepting DNS ... Something (either that NTL are doing or all ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
  • Re: major DNS hiccup
    ... noticeable missing packets - so they'd have to be intercepting DNS ... I'd like to go back to NTL if that's at all possible: ... my Demon connection is a good deal slower than my NTL one. ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
  • Re: major DNS hiccup
    ... I see reply packets with correct checksums and no noticeable missing packets - so they'd have to be intercepting DNS packets, garbaging and retransmitting them: somehow I doubt ntl could manage that quite so successfully :-) ... Maybe NTL ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
  • Re: Post Office Broadband service up and running
    ... Harry wrote: ... but does it deliver packets on Sundays? ... stephen_hope@xxxxxxxxxxxx - replace xyz with ntl ...
    (uk.telecom.broadband)
  • Re: pinging from multihomed server
    ... > mask: 255.255.255.0 ... > Do I have a way to force it ?imagine just you want to check if the ... > using traffic moni tors to capute packets. ... it first checks to see if the destination is on a local subnet. ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.networking)