Re: GMIRROR or ATACONTROL ?

From: Chronos <chronos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:47:20 +0100

After replacing brokenby2703@xxxxxxxxx with a small shell script on
Monday 17 Jul 2006 12:23, the following appeared on stdout:

I did try both ATACONTROL RAID 1 and GMIRROR software raid solution
and let's say that GMIRROR seems "more"... more.... well, just one
step above atacontrol as reliability (imho).

<AOL> Me too </AOL>

The auto-rebuild is reason to use gmirror on its own. I have used both
and find gmirror to be logical and reliable - not that ataraid isn't,
but gmirror just has the edge in terms of features and reliability.
--
Chronos

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GMIRROR or ATACONTROL ?
  - From: brokenby2703

References:
- GMIRROR or ATACONTROL ?
  - From: brokenby2703

Prev by Date: Re: lost both networking cards with new kernel this morning
Next by Date: Re: GMIRROR or ATACONTROL ?
Previous by thread: GMIRROR or ATACONTROL ?
Next by thread: Re: GMIRROR or ATACONTROL ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: ggated vs iscsi
... looking through cvs it looks like those may have been addressed. ... really speak to performance. ... Reliability should be all right as long as ... the comments on here and my own expeineces, so gmirror it is for now. ...
(freebsd-stable)
Re: GMIRROR or ATACONTROL ?
... the following appeared on stdout: ... step above atacontrol as reliability. ... The auto-rebuild is reason to use gmirror on its own. ... but gmirror just has the edge in terms of features and reliability. ...
(comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)