Re: is xeon hyperthreading considered good or bad?
- From: talon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Michel Talon)
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:47:39 +0000 (UTC)
tony broughton <tonybDELETE_THIS_SPAM_BLOCKER17v@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm running 6.2 release on a dual 2.4GHz P4 Xeon machine
(Prestonias) with hyperthreading on in bios. I recompiled the kernel
with SMP on, and have specified machdep.hyperthreading_allowed=1
in /etc/sysctl.conf.
Top now shows me 4 cpus with processes running on all four
cpu ids.
Is this considered a good way to run my hardware? I've noticed
some appends on mailing lists about hyper-threading being
sub-optimal with the fbsd scheduler (I'm using 4BSD) and
wondered whether I'd get better performance with HTT disabled?
The machine is used as a development workhorse with lots
of software compilation.
On my P4 (single core) hypertreading has rather positive benefits. Of
course not to the point of a real dual core.
Thanks for any opinions - Tony
--
Michel TALON
.
- References:
- is xeon hyperthreading considered good or bad?
- From: tony broughton
- is xeon hyperthreading considered good or bad?
- Prev by Date: Re: Disabling background fsck; disabling softupdates; defaulting to "fsck -y"
- Previous by thread: is xeon hyperthreading considered good or bad?
- Next by thread: Authpf and rules wchich don't work at all...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|