Re: FBSD and and the sk() network driver



Begin <Z3Xxj.751$C1.77@trnddc07>
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:14:33 GMT,
Jason Bourne <j_bourne_treadstone@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I bought these cards for home use because they were inexpensive. I do
believe the old adage of "you gets what you pay for...". The reason to pay
more money for a piece of hardware is to get superior performance.

Mind that this adage is only a rule of thumb: While it is entirely
justified to mention when someone is complaining that some known piece
of crap is giving a less than stellar performance, there is no guarantee
a more expensive bit of kit must necessairily be better than a cheaper
counterpart.

I still have a few 21143 NICs that I bought back when for what is now
slightly less than 20 EUR/pc -- 3com 905 cards were more expensive and
not better, realteks were not that much cheaper and much worse.

The SK gear I worked with was first revision stuff and I used it with
FreeBSD 4.{9,11} on SMP machines. I didn't tune much of it as it wasn't
necessairy -- the point was to have substantial faster networking than
the 100Mbit the rest of the network was using[1]. The cards didn't
strike me as crappy or cheap, though.

It would perhaps be interesting to see how the various NICs compare in
throughput, stability, longevity, and so on. Alas, I don't have a lab to
try them all.


[1] Fileserver, and a couple of boxes with heavy data crunching duties.
All were on one barely-managed[2] switch with a Gbit uplink to
the rest of the (managed, cisco switches) network, which itself
used daisy-chained Gbit links for the backbone.
[2] As in, could somewhat set vlans via a barely working full-screen
vt100-assuming interface on the serial port with an odd speed.
About the same class of manageability as the stuff that underpins
el-cheapo ide<->scsi raid stuff, no matter how many layers of
java-interface-providing-linux are slapped on, if with perhaps less
disastrous results.

--
j p d (at) d s b (dot) t u d e l f t (dot) n l .
This message was originally posted on Usenet in plain text.
Any other representation, additions, or changes do not have my
consent and may be a violation of international copyright law.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Slow internet connection woes
    ... And we don't have the money to pay someone on the ... learning when things come up (slow network, e-mail not working, etc.) ... For real time monitoring i use solarwinds network monitor and engineer's ... trap for usage over X for any port. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
  • Re: AT&T/Bellsouth removes alt.binaries.pictures.woodworking
    ... the network by other Verizon users, which is a violation of our ... have been dropped from their server they want you to make it quit ... People pay for what they want. ... USENET is cheap if all you want is ...
    (rec.woodworking)
  • Re: Any way to tune in high number channels without a cable box?
    ... I just found out that the CW network is available and supposedly part ... put the channel it's on at 266 on the dial. ... have to pay an extra $8/month to rent a set top box. ... stations without paying a fee. ...
    (rec.arts.tv)
  • Re: OT:Apps installed on clients
    ... I'd be HAPPY to pay ... I know the reason its free for the home user is because they build ... but since usage on a corporate network violates teh ...
    (microsoft.public.backoffice.smallbiz2000)
  • Re: DISCUSSION TOPIC: Advertising Car Audio Products - What Works?
    ... Yes, with the advent of the Internet and WWW, car audio magazines have ... Before the internet, they were VERY important. ... It seems like the old adage "You Get What You ... Pay For" becomes more and more true the older you get. ...
    (rec.audio.car)