Re: gawk or nawk?
From: Christos Zoulas (christos_at_tac.gw.com)
Date: 10/11/03
- Next message: X-Istence: "Re: Which BSD?"
- Previous message: Boran: "Re: cdrdao problem"
- In reply to: Igor Sobrado: "gawk or nawk?"
- Next in thread: Igor Sobrado: "Re: gawk or nawk?"
- Reply: Igor Sobrado: "Re: gawk or nawk?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 21:25:48 GMT
In article <bm9mnf$d22$1@string1.ciencias.uniovi.es>,
Igor Sobrado <sobrado@string1.ciencias.uniovi.es> wrote:
There are lots of issues tht need to be solved for 2.0 and we don't want
to open new ones ;-)
christos
>Hi all.
>
>I believed that NetBSD 2.0 was replacing GNU awk with the AT&T nawk
>written by Brian Kernighan and others. From the list of changes
>from NetBSD 1.6 to 2.0 it looks like awk(1) has been updated to
>gawk 3.1.3. What is happening with nawk?
>
>Just curious,
>Igor.
>
>--
>Igor Sobrado, UK34436 - sobrado@acm.org
- Next message: X-Istence: "Re: Which BSD?"
- Previous message: Boran: "Re: cdrdao problem"
- In reply to: Igor Sobrado: "gawk or nawk?"
- Next in thread: Igor Sobrado: "Re: gawk or nawk?"
- Reply: Igor Sobrado: "Re: gawk or nawk?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]