Re: Which BSD?

From: jpd (read_the_sig_at_do.not.spam.it)
Date: 11/06/03

  • Next message: Rudolf Polzer: "Re: Which BSD?"
    Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 19:49:36 +0000 (UTC)
    
    

    In article
    <slrnbql2ii.44l.denshimeiru-sapmctacher@message-id.durchnull.ath.cx>,
    Rudolf Polzer wrote:
    > Scripsit ille »David Douthitt« <ssrat@mailbag.com>:
    >> Note that none of the BSDs offer a slick user-friendly graphical
    >> "geewhiz" installation. However, if you can install Slackware or
    >> Gentoo you can certainly install any of the BSDs.
    >
    > BTW, is there a Gentoo-like (Any)BSD install process?

    I don't know that. I do know that the FreeBSD installer works very
    well indeed. The NetBSD installer looks a bit less spiffy (at least when
    I last looked at it) but it works equally well.

    As do the ports/pkgsrc systems on both.

    > The only thing I
    > liked about sysinstall from FreeBSD was the partitioner, the rest was a
    > PITA. Just because the mirror I chose was missing the package index
    > file, it tried over twenty times to download that index file: five times
    > for each package it wanted to install. If I had pressed ^C, I'd probably
    > have had to start over.

    But you didn't try, did you?

    I was helping someone netinstall FreeBSD 4.9 this week and it bombed
    halfway. In hindsight due to a loose cable. Luckily it already had a
    bootable kernel and /stand/sysinstall installed. So, what to do?
    Launch /stand/sysinstall and just re-request installing the binary
    distribution. After that, continue as usual.

    There is no difference in the resulting system when installing only base,
    rebooting into installed system and continue configuring through sysinstall
    compared to trying to do it in one shot. It's just harder to fsck up.

    And that, netinstalling 4.9, off a 4.7 install cdrom.

    > After a long long time, I was finally able to choose another mirror. But
    > such installers suck. Gentoo's installer is /bin/sh - it at least does
    > what I want it to do.

    *shrug* Try ``accidentally'' choosing a mirror that just happens to be
    down with gentoo and see if you still like it that much. How well can
    you recover from a half-way installed system?

    -- 
      j p d (at) d s b (dot) t u d e l f t (dot) n l .
    

  • Next message: Rudolf Polzer: "Re: Which BSD?"

    Relevant Pages

    • problem with printed output from freebsd as a print server using cups, samba, hpijs
      ... I've been experimenting with freebsd for a couple of weeks now, ... and I used gentoo (whose portage install setup is ... I had a Gentoo server that did the following tasks... ... from my windows boxes, I see the samba server and its shares, and its ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Debian vs. Gentoo
      ... Debian Woody ... As for package management, I'm not sure why this was confusing although I ... in Gentoo Linux, which I'll get to in a minute. ... Once you find the name of the package, the easiest way to install it is: ...
      (alt.linux)
    • Re: [OT] Re: What Linux distribution to choose for learning Ruby and Ruby on Rails
      ... very familiar with Gentoo, the ease of integration of gems into Gentoo ... Makefiles like I suspect most other Linux distributions do? ... Specify a gems hierarchy, install the gem utility from ports, and use as ... FreeBSD also presents a far greater sense of the system as an integrated ...
      (comp.lang.ruby)
    • Re: How To Abandon Microsoft
      ... > and I have some interest in Gentoo. ... > I've never seen any other distro remotely as easy to install as RH, ... Gentoo is a breeze to install once you've done it a dozen times or so. ... > If you don't want vendor support you can download the raw bits for free. ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: Video editing in Linux?
      ... There's always the INSTALL text file as well. ... SuSE, Slackware, Debian, Gentoo and LFS and some I've probably forgotten. ... Generally SuSE and Mandrake are the perfect newbie distros. ...
      (alt.linux)