Re: Which BSD?
From: Marco van de Voort (marcov_at_stack.nl)
Date: 11/20/03
- Previous message: Bill Vermillion: "Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX"
- In reply to: David Douthitt: "Re: Which BSD?"
- Next in thread: the.wizard: "Re: Which BSD?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:31:39 +0000 (UTC)
On 2003-11-06, David Douthitt <ssrat@mailbag.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 16:47:15 GMT, merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L.
> Schwartz) wrote:
>
> With BSD, you have to:
>
> make world
>
> ...and pray that it rebuilds your entire massive complete one-in-all
> system correctly.
>
> Even the ports system, nice as it is - if I want to patch for a SSH
> exploit, for example - I can update the port (and do) but if I want to
> update the base? "Oh, gosh, I hope this works..."
>
> For Linux:
>
> rpm -Uvh openssh*.rpm
>
> ...and it's done. Can't BSD do this? I wish it would.... instead of
> using the huge monolithic base.
Openssh is in the ports for these purposes. Install the port, rename the
original binary. Done.
One of the things I like most with the ports system, is that I can rule out
a lot of useless script languages and their modules with a few WITHOUT and
WITH statements in /etc/m(a)k(e).conf.
In all binary distro's this stuff keep clogging up your HDs..
- Previous message: Bill Vermillion: "Re: Newbie looking for a UNIX"
- In reply to: David Douthitt: "Re: Which BSD?"
- Next in thread: the.wizard: "Re: Which BSD?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]