Re: /usr/local removed... but entries for it exist yet!

From: Thor Lancelot Simon (tls_at_panix.com)
Date: 12/17/04 

Date: 16 Dec 2004 23:24:15 -0500

In article <cprnm7$4fj$1@string1.ciencias.uniovi.es>,
Igor Sobrado <igor@no-spam.on.the.net> wrote:
>
>between OS releases). I use /usr/contrib instead because it was
>the place where that software was provided in earlier BSD releases

That is wrong. If you don't believe me, get the BSD SCCS files and
look for yourself.

/usr/contrib was for software *contributed to Berkeley for inclusion in
the BSD release, but not integrated into the main source tree*. 

-- 
 Thor Lancelot Simon	                                      tls@rek.tjls.com
"The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency is to be
 abandoned or transcended, there is no problem."		- Noam Chomsky