Re: sparc64 port

From: raphael mazelier (raf_at_ztrip.ath.cx)
Date: 12/17/04

  • Next message: Jerry Heyman: "Re: /usr/local removed... but entries for it exist yet!" 
    Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:47:39 +0100

    Kristofer Pettijohn wrote:
    > ... They say it runs on a Blade 100/150 - has anyone had any experience
    > with it on a Blade 1500?
    >
    > Kristofer

    Blade 1500 have an Ultra Sparc IIIi processor.
    I don't think this kind of processor is supported by
    netbsd. A donation would be apprecieted, for helping
    developpers to port on it ;)

    raf

  • Next message: Jerry Heyman: "Re: /usr/local removed... but entries for it exist yet!"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: sparc64 port
      ... > Kristofer Pettijohn wrote: ... > Blade 1500 have an Ultra Sparc IIIi processor. ... NetBSD runs on a Blade 100 but the release version 2.0 does not support ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc)
    • Re: SunBlade 1500 .. question
      ... Kristofer Pettijohn wrote: ... > Does anyone know if there are any other OS's other than Solaris that ... > will run on a Blade 1500? ... Many a smale maketh a grate -- Geoffrey Chaucer ...
      (comp.unix.questions)
    • Re: SPARC MHZ refresh ?
      ... >> but the longer it takes for the next refresh, it higher the clockrate ... >> Ultra SPARC IV for a CPU speed up. ... Don't forget though that Sun can't afford to do ... is similar to a Blade 2000 with 1.2MHz US III. ...
      (comp.unix.solaris)