Re: More RAM or quicker CPU?
From: jpd (read_the_sig_at_do.not.spam.it.invalid)
Date: 02/22/05
- Previous message: A L Meyers: "More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- In reply to: A L Meyers: "More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- Next in thread: Jerry Heyman: "Re: More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- Reply: Jerry Heyman: "Re: More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 22 Feb 2005 15:42:56 GMT
Begin <3811e6F5het0pU1@individual.net>
On 2005-02-22, A L Meyers <me@privacy.net> wrote:
> Have a dual-processor i686 main board at 400 MH with 128 MB of physical
> RAM. All other things being equal, to speed up compilation, e.g. doing
> "make update" in glibc (took 3 days and completely successfully), would
> it help more to double RAM to 256 MB or double processor speed?
My guess would be ram, but disk might be an issue, too. The first
step you'd take would be to monitor what it is doing to see where the
bottleneck is. There's various tools for that, starting with top(1).
-- j p d (at) d s b (dot) t u d e l f t (dot) n l .
- Previous message: A L Meyers: "More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- In reply to: A L Meyers: "More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- Next in thread: Jerry Heyman: "Re: More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- Reply: Jerry Heyman: "Re: More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|