Re: More RAM or quicker CPU?
From: Karsten Kruse (tecneeq_at_gmx.net)
Date: 02/22/05
- Previous message: jpd: "Re: More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- In reply to: A L Meyers: "More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- Next in thread: jpd: "Re: More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- Reply: jpd: "Re: More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:00:42 +0100
A L Meyers wrote:
> Have a dual-processor i686 main board at 400 MH with 128 MB of physical
> RAM. All other things being equal, to speed up compilation, e.g. doing
> "make update" in glibc (took 3 days and completely successfully), would
> it help more to double RAM to 256 MB or double processor speed?
You can save 100% compilation time by not compiling glibc, you don't need
it to run NetBSD.
I guess the jump from 400 MHz to 800 MHz is far more effective than from
128 MB Ram to 256 MB Ram.
Karsten
--
Homepage, Mac68k, A/UX-Links und Shorties: www.tecneeq.de
() Linux/NetBSD-Anleitungen, Forum und Chat: www.newbie-net.de
<\/>
_/\_ Debian - Yesterday's technology ... tomorrow.
- Previous message: jpd: "Re: More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- In reply to: A L Meyers: "More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- Next in thread: jpd: "Re: More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- Reply: jpd: "Re: More RAM or quicker CPU?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|