Re: Accepting external sendmail on 2.0.2
From: Igor Sobrado (igor_at_string1.ciencias.uniovi.es)
Date: 07/05/05
- Next message: dave: "NetBSD and Java"
- Previous message: Frederick Bruckman: "Re: Accepting external sendmail on 2.0.2"
- In reply to: Frederick Bruckman: "Re: Accepting external sendmail on 2.0.2"
- Next in thread: Martin Neitzel: "Re: Accepting external sendmail on 2.0.2"
- Reply: Martin Neitzel: "Re: Accepting external sendmail on 2.0.2"
- Reply: Frederick Bruckman: "Re: Accepting external sendmail on 2.0.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 5 Jul 2005 16:50:05 +0200
Frederick Bruckman <fredb@immanent.net> wrote:
>
> If you only have one interface, or if you don't mind listening on all
> the ones you do have, "address=0.0.0.0" should work, too -- or simply
> comment out that line. The point of that line in the default config
> is to let programs such as "cron" invoke "sendmail" or "mail", and
> let them "just work", without enabling a listener on the network. Of
> course, if you're setting up a mail server, it's a different story.
I think that sendmail listening in the loopback interface by default
is a *fine* decision. It is useful (required!) for "vi" too, and it
is the best method for retrieving email in a secure way using
fetchmail too. Certainly, sendmail should be listening in the
loopback interface by default on all systems, and listening on
external interfaces only on real mail servers.
I like the default NetBSD configuration, without processes listening
to the external interfaces.
Is there a reason X11 listens to external interfaces by default when
X is running? I have closed it:
$ cat .xserverrc
#!/bin/sh
PATH=/usr/X11R6/bin
exec X :0 -dpi 100 -nolisten tcp
and see no differences (telnet daemon is closed by default, and ssh
does not really require these 6000+x ports opened). Is it reasonable
asking these ports to be closed by default?
Cheers,
Igor.
- Next message: dave: "NetBSD and Java"
- Previous message: Frederick Bruckman: "Re: Accepting external sendmail on 2.0.2"
- In reply to: Frederick Bruckman: "Re: Accepting external sendmail on 2.0.2"
- Next in thread: Martin Neitzel: "Re: Accepting external sendmail on 2.0.2"
- Reply: Martin Neitzel: "Re: Accepting external sendmail on 2.0.2"
- Reply: Frederick Bruckman: "Re: Accepting external sendmail on 2.0.2"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|