comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?
From: Mike Cox (mikecoxlinux_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/20/05
- Next message: Adam H. Kerman: "Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?"
- Previous message: The Doctor: "Password protected Virtual FTP site"
- Next in thread: Adam H. Kerman: "Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?"
- Reply: Adam H. Kerman: "Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?"
- Reply: Steve O'Hara-Smith: "Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?"
- Reply: clvrmnky: "Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?"
- Reply: Polarhound: "Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 20 Sep 2005 11:21:26 -0700
Seems as though all the other bsds have a big 8 group...shouldn't one
be created for dragonfly bsd? It seems that something changed in the
last few years, and that a big 8 usenet group has stopped being a
requirement for the BSDs! Who'd have thought that a BSD, an operating
system synonimous with the internet, email, and usenet would not having
its own big 8 group!
Back in the day, the first things someone in a project like
dragonflybsd would be to get the ball rolling on a big 8 group. What
happened?
- Next message: Adam H. Kerman: "Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?"
- Previous message: The Doctor: "Password protected Virtual FTP site"
- Next in thread: Adam H. Kerman: "Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?"
- Reply: Adam H. Kerman: "Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?"
- Reply: Steve O'Hara-Smith: "Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?"
- Reply: clvrmnky: "Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?"
- Reply: Polarhound: "Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|