Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?

From: Adam H. Kerman (ahk_at_chinet.com)
Date: 09/20/05 

Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:20:58 -0500

At 11:21am -0700, 09/20/05, Mike Cox <mikecoxlinux@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Seems as though all the other bsds have a big 8 group...shouldn't one
>be created for dragonfly bsd?

All the users not posting on the topic to Usenet say so. 25 mentions of
"dragonfly bsd" in the last 90 days.

They don't appear to have the same objections to mailing lists as you.

I didn't notice any recent message from you, btw.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?
    ... All the users not posting on the topic to Usenet say so. ... "dragonfly bsd" in the last 90 days. ... I didn't notice any recent message from you, btw. ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
  • Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?
    ... All the users not posting on the topic to Usenet say so. ... "dragonfly bsd" in the last 90 days. ... I didn't notice any recent message from you, btw. ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc)
  • Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?
    ... Adam H. Kerman wrote: ... > All the users not posting on the topic to Usenet say so. ... So are you saying dragonfly bsd is pretty much a still-born OS? ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc)
  • Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?
    ... Adam H. Kerman wrote: ... > All the users not posting on the topic to Usenet say so. ... So are you saying dragonfly bsd is pretty much a still-born OS? ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.netbsd.misc)
  • Re: comp.unix.bsd.dragonflybsd ?
    ... Adam H. Kerman wrote: ... > All the users not posting on the topic to Usenet say so. ... So are you saying dragonfly bsd is pretty much a still-born OS? ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)