Re: amanda, OpenBSD and gnutar?
From: Kirk Strauser (kirk_at_strauser.com)
Date: 10/29/03
- Next message: phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: amanda, OpenBSD and gnutar?"
- Previous message: Roy: "Redefinition Error with NTP-4.2.0 on OpenBSD 3.3"
- In reply to: phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: amanda, OpenBSD and gnutar?"
- Next in thread: phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: amanda, OpenBSD and gnutar?"
- Reply: phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: amanda, OpenBSD and gnutar?"
- Reply: Christian Weisgerber: "Re: amanda, OpenBSD and gnutar?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 04:35:15 GMT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 2003-10-28T18:08:57Z, phn@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu writes:
> Amanda does very well with 'dump' on OpenBSD. Do not accept any cheap
> substitutes.
So, how accurate is OpenBSD's dump on active filesystems? No other OS
manages to get consistent images without using filesystem snapshots and I
suspect that OpenBSD is no different.
- --
Kirk Strauser
The Strauser Group
Open. Solutions. Simple.
http://www.strausergroup.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/n0La5sRg+Y0CpvERApzuAJ0dzrnrKleHOVhH/1Ee6zrNrjwzZgCeKvGQ
jes9wQDWlSNAWMwhdHCuXEQ=
=fDb8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Next message: phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: amanda, OpenBSD and gnutar?"
- Previous message: Roy: "Redefinition Error with NTP-4.2.0 on OpenBSD 3.3"
- In reply to: phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: amanda, OpenBSD and gnutar?"
- Next in thread: phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: amanda, OpenBSD and gnutar?"
- Reply: phn_at_icke-reklam.ipsec.nu: "Re: amanda, OpenBSD and gnutar?"
- Reply: Christian Weisgerber: "Re: amanda, OpenBSD and gnutar?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]