Re: confusion with the pf filter rule syntax
From: Greg Hennessy (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 11/24/03
- Previous message: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: confusion with the pf filter rule syntax"
- In reply to: Sameer: "confusion with the pf filter rule syntax"
- Next in thread: Marco S Hyman: "Re: confusion with the pf filter rule syntax"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:17:38 +0000
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 06:24:05 GMT, "Sameer" <ssnewsgroups@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>why do you need to state an interface as well as a source address? won't it
>suffice to simply state a source and a destination, thereby circumventing
>the "on int" portion?
>
One may have multiple addresses on that interface.
greg
-- $ReplyAddress =~ s#\@.*$##; # Delete everything after the '@' The Following is a true story..... Only the names have been changed to protect the guilty.
- Previous message: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: confusion with the pf filter rule syntax"
- In reply to: Sameer: "confusion with the pf filter rule syntax"
- Next in thread: Marco S Hyman: "Re: confusion with the pf filter rule syntax"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|