Re: Bad blocks on IDE drive (newbie question)
From: Matt Bostock (matt_at_mattbostock.com)
Date: 06/28/04
- Next message: Matt Bostock: "Rebuilding my system binaries led to some kind of kernel panic..?"
- Previous message: Tim Judd: "Re: disklabel: partition X: partition extends past end of unit"
- In reply to: Tim Judd: "Re: Bad blocks on IDE drive (newbie question)"
- Next in thread: Tim Judd: "Re: Bad blocks on IDE drive (newbie question)"
- Reply: Tim Judd: "Re: Bad blocks on IDE drive (newbie question)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:03:10 +0100
Tim Judd wrote:
> As I recall, the bad blocks are marked by the format process.
FAT/FAT32
> marks in it's File Allocation Table (hence, FAT) that sector xxxx is
> bad. The MBR marks "Partition one starts here, ends here and is of this
> filesystem." I doubt the OS has anything to do with it. I think the OS
> asks to write a file to disk, and the Filesystem checks the FAT before
> writing to a bad cluster.
>
> I have absolutely NO CLUE how OBSD marks bad clusters/blocks/sectors.
> I'd get a new drive to put OBSD on anyway, but you said you can't get
> one now. OK, so get a used one from salvation army, go to
> http://www.streetprices.com/ or the like for inexpensive devices. Don't
> forget to check http://www.resellerratings.com/ to check their repitoire
> before laying money down.
>
> HTH
Thanks for the info Tim. Perhaps OBSD would have checked for bad blocks
upon formatting my drive during the install?
Thanks,
Matt :)
- Next message: Matt Bostock: "Rebuilding my system binaries led to some kind of kernel panic..?"
- Previous message: Tim Judd: "Re: disklabel: partition X: partition extends past end of unit"
- In reply to: Tim Judd: "Re: Bad blocks on IDE drive (newbie question)"
- Next in thread: Tim Judd: "Re: Bad blocks on IDE drive (newbie question)"
- Reply: Tim Judd: "Re: Bad blocks on IDE drive (newbie question)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|