Re: Article for Firewall Failover with pfsync and CARP
From: sam (samwun_at_hgcbroadband.com)
Date: 06/30/04
- Next message: clvrmnky: "Re: Seperate different class of rules to different pf conf files."
- Previous message: sam: "Seperate different class of rules to different pf conf files."
- In reply to: Peter Matulis: "Re: Article for Firewall Failover with pfsync and CARP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:25:21 +0800
Peter Matulis wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:39:18 +0800, sam <samwun@hgcbroadband.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Dear all,
>>
>>Does anyone know where is the article for pfsync-carp?
>>The link for Firewall Failover with pfsync and CARP is not reachable now.
>
>
> Try:
>
> http://www.countersiege.com/doc/pfsync-carp/
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/2873
Is better using pfsync-carp than PF with rdr (with the using of
round-robin, and route-to) ?
thanks
sam
- Next message: clvrmnky: "Re: Seperate different class of rules to different pf conf files."
- Previous message: sam: "Seperate different class of rules to different pf conf files."
- In reply to: Peter Matulis: "Re: Article for Firewall Failover with pfsync and CARP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|