Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure.
From: Dave Uhring (daveuhring_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/11/04
- Previous message: Freeride: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- In reply to: Dariusz Kuliński / TaKeDa: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- Next in thread: Bill Vermillion: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- Reply: Bill Vermillion: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- Reply: David Magda: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:23:37 -0500
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 20:45:49 -0700, Dariusz Kuli?ski / TaKeDa wrote:
> I don't know what do you mean by console, (I guess like most people you
> assuming that access to console is equal with sitting next to the
> computer).
I thought it pretty damn obvious since I mentioned booting from CDROM.
> Well that's not always true. For example I have my FreeBSD configured to
> have console on serial cable, so console could be even in different room.
> If I mark console as insecure, there is no way you could do anything
> without knowing root password, because you don't have physical access to
> the computer, you just have access to console, no way to change bios
> settings or inserting floppy, cdrom or removing hard drive.
And if I can boot that system from CDROM none of your security settings
mean a thing nor does the root password.
- Previous message: Freeride: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- In reply to: Dariusz Kuliński / TaKeDa: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- Next in thread: Bill Vermillion: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- Reply: Bill Vermillion: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- Reply: David Magda: "Re: Linux, BSD, and Unix are fundamentally insecure."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|