Re: Dual port dual subnet question

From: Ben Jirou (benedict_chong_at_speakeasy.net)
Date: 09/13/04 

Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:00:06 -0700

Ooops. That was a typo on the post. The pf.conf has the correct
"*.0/24" thing.

:-)

Ben

Dave Uhring <daveuhring@yahoo.com> wrote:

%On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:40:41 -0700, Ben Jirou wrote:
%
%> nat on $ext1 from 192.168.1.1/24 to any -> $ext1
%> nat on $ext1 from 192.168.2.1/24 to any -> $ext1
%
%You *do* know that Class C networks are designated with a .0 as the
last
%quad, don't you?

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT Republicans "conservative"?
    ... Typo or arcane, legal-beagle only meaning? ... OOOPS. ... It is a typo and I should have caught it. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: new free Anonymizer: anonycat.com
    ... > work for the government, I have a little pride. ... Ooops: typo on main page: ...
    (comp.security.misc)
  • Re: FS: UDN6118A-1s and UDN7180As
    ... All I can say is, screw ePay, who doesn't ... everybody sell stuff like this? ... Ooops, small typo, I meant WHY, not who... ...
    (rec.games.pinball)
  • Re: Chi -squared Fitting problem
    ... > Imax, tmax, s and b are here four free fit parameters, z is a given ... Ooops. ... Obvious typo: I meant ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Dual port dual subnet question
    ... I tried parentheses but that did not make any difference. ... Thanks for the suggestion. ... %> Dave Uhring wrote: ... %> No typo, here is how I have it (copy and paste from putty this ...
    (comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc)