Re: No pf....route exists
From: Inquiry (openbsd_inquiry_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 05/25/05
- Next message: transpetaflops: "RaidFrame and multiple arrays on same disks"
- Previous message: Creeper: "Re: Obtaining 3.7 install cd..."
- In reply to: Peter N. M. Hansteen: "Re: No pf....route exists"
- Next in thread: Peter N. M. Hansteen: "Re: No pf....route exists"
- Reply: Peter N. M. Hansteen: "Re: No pf....route exists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 24 May 2005 17:28:41 -0700
Thank you for the response. I'll get on to it tonight.
Several weeks ago I looked through the documents at
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ looks like it was a lot of fun! Glad
to have received a response from you.
Thanks,
Tommy
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> "Inquiry" <openbsd_inquiry@yahoo.com> writes:
>
> > - using a standalone host
> > - a route has been set within the system according to the route command
> > - I am connecting to the Internet with no firewall at this time...once
> > pfctl invokes pf.conf "pfctl -e -f /etc/pf.conf" no packets route.
>
> It looks to me like you are making things overly complicated. (One of
> the errors is very easy to explain btw - the _ppp user does not have the
> privileges to run the pfctl command.)
>
> For one thing, why is it useful to enable or disable pf? pf does not
> consume a lot of resources, and compensating for dynamically assigned IP
> addresses does not take major magic.
>
> If you are able to connect to the internet without pf, I'd say you have
> a reasonable starting point. Go back to the last working setup (the
> last one which connected cleanly), strip away anything you're not
> positive you need, such as the route commands in rc.local. ppp is pretty
> good at setting sensible default routes, and IIRC the default HISADDR
> etc belongs strictly in the ppp config files, so you may be setting
> yourself up with a default route going essentially nowhere with your
> rc.local. Take it from there, create a nice rule set which does its
> filtering on the tun0 device.
>
> It's possible my evolving pf tutorial at http://www.bgnett.no/~peter/pf/
> is useful.
>
> --
> Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
> http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
> "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"
- Next message: transpetaflops: "RaidFrame and multiple arrays on same disks"
- Previous message: Creeper: "Re: Obtaining 3.7 install cd..."
- In reply to: Peter N. M. Hansteen: "Re: No pf....route exists"
- Next in thread: Peter N. M. Hansteen: "Re: No pf....route exists"
- Reply: Peter N. M. Hansteen: "Re: No pf....route exists"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|