Re: using more physical memory?

From: Chris Kantarjiev (cak+news_at_dimebank.com)
Date: 06/21/05 

Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 11:33:57 -0700

For grins, I compiled my little program with the gnu malloc, which never calls
sbrk anywhere. It's slightly better than the 1023 MB I was getting before:

*** 331 % limit
cputime unlimited
filesize unlimited
datasize 1048576 kbytes
stacksize 4096 kbytes
coredumpsize 1000 kbytes
memoryuse 3642208 kbytes
memorylocked 3643304 kbytes
maxproc 128
openfiles 64
*** 332 % glutton
Cannot map anonymous memorychunk: 1 MB, final size: 1284096 KB 1254 MB

I wonder what limit I'm hitting now? The machine has 4GB physical.

Quantcast