Re: using more physical memory?
From: Chris Kantarjiev (cak+news_at_dimebank.com)
Date: 06/21/05
- Next message: Shane Almeida: "Re: Staying current with -current"
- Previous message: tedu: "Re: Staying current with -current"
- In reply to: tedu: "Re: using more physical memory?"
- Next in thread: Christopher A. Kantarjiev: "Re: using more physical memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:51:49 -0700
tedu wrote:
> have a look at the new malloc.c in cvs. it uses mmap.
> (the kernel has since changed to account mmap as part of your data
> limit, but not in 3.7)
>
OK, I grabbed that and compiled. I'm still coming up against a limit of 1284096
KB 1254 MB despite
*** 359 % limit
cputime unlimited
filesize unlimited
datasize 1048576 kbytes
stacksize 4096 kbytes
coredumpsize 1000 kbytes
memoryuse 3642208 kbytes
memorylocked 3643304 kbytes
maxproc 128
openfiles 64
This is a 3.5 machine... any ideas?
Thanks again.
- Next message: Shane Almeida: "Re: Staying current with -current"
- Previous message: tedu: "Re: Staying current with -current"
- In reply to: tedu: "Re: using more physical memory?"
- Next in thread: Christopher A. Kantarjiev: "Re: using more physical memory?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]