Re: Hiding NATs with PF
From: Max Bolingbroke (batterseapower_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/28/05
- Next message: Max Bolingbroke: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- Previous message: Max Bolingbroke: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- In reply to: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- Next in thread: jpd: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: 28 Sep 2005 13:53:26 -0700
Greg Hennessy wrote:
> >Interesting, they don't cite that as a reason. What abuse could be
> >hidden by a NAT that could not be hidden by a single host with firewall
> >enabled?
>
> Nothing routing related, but as Simon also says, if your LAN is compromised
> with a hijacked system......
I see. I would have considered this only as bad as having a single
attached PC (no NAT) comprimised, but they may have their reasons..
Thanks for your help,
Max
- Next message: Max Bolingbroke: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- Previous message: Max Bolingbroke: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- In reply to: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- Next in thread: jpd: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|