Re: Hiding NATs with PF

From: Max Bolingbroke (batterseapower_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/28/05 

Date: 28 Sep 2005 14:04:21 -0700

Greg Hennessy wrote:
> ~ # grep -i inet /etc/sysctl.conf | grep -v "^#"
> net.inet.tcp.recvspace=262144
> net.inet.tcp.sendspace=262144
>
> Cant remember if the sysctls share the same OID's on Open.
> So you may have to tweak.

They are the same, just FYI. All your settings worked beautifully :)

> Strictly speaking, a multi homed unix box with Socks on one interface and
> routing disabled between them cannot be described as a 'router' per-ce.
>
> Think of it as obeying the letter rather than spirit of the directive LOL.

Heh :). My fallback option was going to be a multihomed system with a
HTTP proxy doing the "routing", but now I have remembred sockscap I can
use this, far more general solution.

Many thanks for your help,

Max

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Windows XP Tweak ?
    ... Start/Run keeps a history, open it. ... If this pertained to branding, ... > or what the Tweak was called. ... I cant remember what I typed in next. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Windows XP Tweak ?
    ... Please reply to the News Groups ... "pete" wrote in message ... > or what the Tweak was called. ... I cant remember what I typed in next. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Windows XP Tweak ?
    ... novice on this, I should of never tried it. ... I cant remember what I typed in next. ... tweak was supposed to remove all the banners and garbage from web pages. ... I am at a loss. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)