Re: Hiding NATs with PF
From: Greg Hennessy (me_at_privacy.org)
Date: 09/29/05
- Previous message: jpd: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- In reply to: Max Bolingbroke: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- Next in thread: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:07:07 +0100
On 28 Sep 2005 14:04:21 -0700, "Max Bolingbroke"
<batterseapower@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Heh :). My fallback option was going to be a multihomed system with a
>HTTP proxy doing the "routing", but now I have remembred sockscap I can
>use this, far more general solution.
>
>Many thanks for your help,
>
You're welcome :-)
Greg
-- "Access to a waiting list is not access to health care"
- Previous message: jpd: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- In reply to: Max Bolingbroke: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- Next in thread: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]