Re: Hiding NATs with PF
From: Greg Hennessy (me_at_privacy.org)
Date: 09/29/05
- Previous message: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- In reply to: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:36:37 +0100
On 29 Sep 2005 04:25:42 GMT, Daniel Hartmeier <daniel@benzedrine.cx> wrote:
>They might not even look at TCP fingerprints, but do simple traffic
>analysis.
True.
>Like, two nearly concurrent requests from Windows boxen to
>their update service, two applications checking for updates at a
>higher rate than expected from a single client, two parallel request
>to google, etc.
Easily explained away by claiming use of VMware.
greg
-- "Access to a waiting list is not access to health care"
- Previous message: Greg Hennessy: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- In reply to: Daniel Hartmeier: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]