Re: Hiding NATs with PF

From: Max Bolingbroke (batterseapower_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 09/30/05

  • Next message: jpd: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF" 
    Date: 29 Sep 2005 16:31:55 -0700

    Thanks a lot for all your replies on this issue: I'll be checking into
    all this stuff over the next few days, and I'll try and adopt the most
    paranoid option. I hadn't even thought about multicast either: setting
    up a NAT is far more complicated than PF makes it appear :)

    Thanks again,

    Max

  • Next message: jpd: "Re: Hiding NATs with PF"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Trust over NAT
      ... In my DNS I put a forward lookup zone for ... I can ping domain2.com and it replies with 10.202.13.1 ... NAT address should be public not internal.... ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
    • Re: Trust over NAT
      ... I can ping domain2.com and it replies with 10.202.13.1 ... I can ping the domain name and it uses the NAT address and replies back ... NAT address should be public not internal.... ... domain1.com, domain2.com, ip address, Dns configuration, etc. ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)
    • Re: [fw-wiz] Forward 2 networks
      ... Thanks for the replies. ... # ENABLE FORWARDING / NAT / MASQUERADING ... # enable ftp NAT ...
      (Firewall-Wizards)
    • Re: arp query - intrusion attempt?
      ... And, unless there are some static translations in the NAT box, those ... fwiw the timeout seems to have little rhyme or reason. ... Guess that sort of answers one question, and raises another - why no fixed timeout? ... Please use the corrected version of the address below for replies. ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc)
    • Re: Trust over NAT
      ... I can ping the domain name and it uses the NAT address and replies back no ... NAT address should be public not internal.... ... I must use the real Dns IPAdddress, ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)