Re: pxe-booting openbsd live environment
- From: Joachim Schipper <joachim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Feb 2007 16:04:32 GMT
pankajtakawale <pankaj.takawale@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Huh? That can be the very same server, and using NFS versus sending themy dhcp & tftp server runs on windows box. so i would have overhead of
whole system via TFTP is a big win for the network and pretty much
everything else. And results in much faster booting, too.
1 more unix server just to place root & swap filesystems.
Huh? Are you really sure there isn't at least one NFS server for Windows
that doesn't suck worse than its UNIX equivalents? (Or failing that,
doesn't suck badly enough not to work at all.)
I admit to having zero interest in this, and thus very knowledge, but
http://www.google.com/search?q=windows+nfs+server suggests I am not the
first one to think that NFS on Windows could be useful. (And the results
includes something using Cygwin, which should be very useful - I've
heard a lot of good things about Cygwin.)
Joachim
.
- References:
- pxe-booting openbsd live environment
- From: pankajtakawale
- Re: pxe-booting openbsd live environment
- From: Josh Grosse
- Re: pxe-booting openbsd live environment
- From: pankajtakawale
- Re: pxe-booting openbsd live environment
- From: Joachim Schipper
- Re: pxe-booting openbsd live environment
- From: pankajtakawale
- pxe-booting openbsd live environment
- Prev by Date: Re: PING: Igor S. , regarding Kerberos v4.
- Next by Date: Re: PHP 4, 5, or neither?
- Previous by thread: Re: pxe-booting openbsd live environment
- Next by thread: Change i/o addresses for PCI card
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|