Re: Why can't OpenBSD's securelevels be saved?!
- From: Josh Grosse <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:08:19 -0500
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:00:53 -0700, Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
It appears as though securelevel is (or securelevels are?) in
an untenable position. Just how long can kernel-level code that is
considered to be "useless" by a security-conscious OS project's leader ,
and that will not be maintained , remain within the kernel?
Wrong place to post your continuing concern. misc@ or security@ or
deraadt@ are more applicable places than Usenet.
--
Replying directly will get you locally blacklisted.
Change the address; use my first name in front of the @ if you want to
communicate privately.
.
- References:
- Re: Why can't OpenBSD's securelevels be saved?!
- From: Borked Pseudo Mailed
- Re: Why can't OpenBSD's securelevels be saved?!
- Prev by Date: Re: Why can't OpenBSD's securelevels be saved?!
- Next by Date: Re: Why can't OpenBSD's securelevels be saved?!
- Previous by thread: Re: Why can't OpenBSD's securelevels be saved?!
- Next by thread: Re: Why can't OpenBSD's securelevels be saved?!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|