Re: pf and bittorrent
- From: Clever Monkey <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 10:33:52 -0400
Dave wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I'd prefer to use the standard ports, so as to assure maximum compatibility. I've added the rules, which bittorrent client do you use is it on a linux box and how is it invoked?Nope, I use a fancy GUI on OS X. OBSD just has to forward those packets to the right host.
Thanks.
Contrary to my last comment, if I change the ruleset to rdr BT traffic to a specific host:port, I (surprise!) get more peer connections.
I think folks recommend using the non-default ports because so many ISPs will block them. I suspect traffic-shaping is becoming more common, so this is unlikely to be an issue over time. Though, I guess this is why many apps recommend you bump the port you use to a single "ephemeral" port. Since you announce your IP and port to peers, they know which one to talk to you back on.
--
clvrmnky <mailto:spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Direct replies will be blacklisted. Replace "spamtrap" with my name to
contact me directly.
.
- References:
- pf and bittorrent
- From: Dave
- Re: pf and bittorrent
- From: Clever Monkey
- Re: pf and bittorrent
- From: Dave
- pf and bittorrent
- Prev by Date: Re: Start Up problem
- Next by Date: Creating a cheap wireless "server" with openbsd.
- Previous by thread: Re: pf and bittorrent
- Next by thread: Re: pf and bittorrent
- Index(es):