Re: /bin/ksh not found
From: Rich Teer (rich.teer@rite-group.com)
Date: 04/22/03
- Next message: scriptOmatic: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Previous message: gilgantic: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- In reply to: Floyd Davidson: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Next in thread: joe@invalid.address: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Reply: joe@invalid.address: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Reply: Floyd Davidson: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Reply: Valentin Nechayev: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Rich Teer <rich.teer@rite-group.com> Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 15:54:03 GMT
On 21 Apr 2003, Floyd Davidson wrote:
> Linux is just one of the many variations of unix that exist today.
I don't want to turn this into a flame war, but all the time
Linux is incapable of passing the UNIX certification tests
(regardless of whether or not someone coughs up the cash to
actually formally certify it), Linux != UNIX.
-- Rich Teer, SCNA President, Rite Online Inc. Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638 URL: http://www.rite-online.net
- Next message: scriptOmatic: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Previous message: gilgantic: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- In reply to: Floyd Davidson: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Next in thread: joe@invalid.address: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Reply: joe@invalid.address: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Reply: Floyd Davidson: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Reply: Valentin Nechayev: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
