Re: /bin/ksh not found
From: joe@invalid.address
Date: 04/22/03
- Next message: Floyd Davidson: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Previous message: scriptOmatic: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- In reply to: Rich Teer: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Next in thread: Floyd Davidson: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: joe@invalid.address Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:19:25 GMT
Rich Teer <rich.teer@rite-group.com> writes:
> On 21 Apr 2003, Floyd Davidson wrote:
>
> > Linux is just one of the many variations of unix that exist today.
>
> I don't want to turn this into a flame war, but all the time
> Linux is incapable of passing the UNIX certification tests
> (regardless of whether or not someone coughs up the cash to
> actually formally certify it), Linux != UNIX.
Careful, we'll have the Rev in here soon :-)
- Next message: Floyd Davidson: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Previous message: scriptOmatic: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- In reply to: Rich Teer: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Next in thread: Floyd Davidson: "Re: /bin/ksh not found"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
